There are varying points of view especially revolving around the size of the sales force, with the argument that with a small sales team (a couple of sales people) perhaps having a sales manager do both was a cost effective tactic.
With this aside the overwhelming consensus was it is not a good long term strategy for the following reasons:
• It sets up a conflict of interest for the sales manager
• Role definition becomes complicated
• Compensation is very problematic
• It confuses the sales team
• Accountability is questionable
• The greater issues of planning, training, tracking, and managing are sub-optimized
An interesting caveat suggested that many owners and management teams follow a “player coach” approach because they truly don’t understand or appreciate the sales process and the need for structure and accountability in a sales organization.
To underscore this observation the experts observed that in the small to medium size business sector, management doesn’t view Sales like other functional departments. They naturally have managers assigned to lead Operations, Accounting, IT, and HR without hesitation, but try to develop some sort of hybrid for Sales.
The experts speculate it is because Sales is not considered a department that can be adequately planned, managed, held accountable, or measured through a process like other departs.
Essentially Sales is viewed as an “art” form and cannot be managed in the traditional way.
Sales is the life blood of any organization, not having a specific person assigned and accountable for the entire process of strategic planning, training, tracking and managing is a huge mistake!
The upshot of the discussion was it simply doesn’t work in the majority of businesses other than very small start- ups or companies in their formative stages.
Our Blogs are Authored by various members of the NEALABC team.